Pengembangan Soal Asesemen Kompetensi Minimum Literasi Membaca Level 4 Menggunakan Aplikasi Wizer.Me
Keywords:
Item Analysis, Minimum Competency Assessment Questions, Reading Literacy, Wizer.meAbstract
The development of minimum literacy reading competency assessment questions level 4 using the wizer.me application at SMP Negeri 41 Palembang aims to; (1) describe the needs of educators and students; (2) design a product in the form of minimum literacy reading competency assessment questions level 4 using the wizer.me application; (3) describe the feasibility of the product according to experts; (4) describe the results of validity and reliability; and (5) describe the results of item analysis. The research and development method used is the Borg and Gall and Djiwandono combination research and development method. The validation test was carried out by experts consisting of educator and student needs questionnaire experts, question/evaluation experts, material experts, and language experts. The results of the validation of the educator questionnaire aspect obtained a percentage value of 95%, the results of the validation of the student questionnaire aspect obtained a percentage value of 100%. Then, the results of the validation of the question aspect percentage value 92.30%. The results of the validation of the material aspect percentage value 96.42%. The results of the validation of the language aspect percentage value 97.5%. The validity of the multiple choice questions 0.69 high interpretation. Validity of essay questions 0.88 very high interpretation. Validity of short answer questions 0.60 high interpretation. Validity of complex multiple choice questions 0.77 high interpretation. Validity of matching questions 0.71 high interpretation. In the analysis of item validity, 50 questions were declared valid. In the analysis of multiple choice reliability 0.82 high category. Essay reliability 0.93 very high category. Reliability of short answer 0.75 high category. Reliability of complex multiple choice 0.87 high category. Reliability of matching 0.83 high category. The results of the item analysis showed that 50 questions had a moderate level of difficulty. Based on the results of the analysis of discriminatory power and distractor quality, there were no questions with options that needed to be improved.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Russel Marga Retha Nadapdap, Hetilaniar Hetilaniar, Ernalida Ernalida, Nurhayati Nurhayati (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Bangkiring Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Pendidikan journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Bangkiring Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Pendidikan journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
